How to Evaluate A Potential Collaborator or Partner

By  |  0 Comments

There are times when a collaboration appears on the surface to be made in heaven, and when you feel you just can afford to ignore the opportunity to partner with someone. Although I believe that few of these relationships ever work out in the long term, let’s look at some clear criteria which can at least protect your interests if you decide to move forward.

» First, check out the chemistry.

These relationships can be tougher than marriages. Meet a half-dozen or more times at some length. Have some meals together (I’ve seen poor table manners sour a relationship). Find out how the other person comports himself or herself in a variety of differing circumstances. Is there a fit socially as well as professionally? Do you look forward to the next meeting, of find an excuse to shorten it or avoid it?

» Second, check references.

Talk to people who have worked with the other party. This is quite proper in terms of evaluating an alliance of any kind. Ask about the downside. (If there is no downside, either find more candid references, or run for the hills. We ALL have downsides.). If alliances ended, find out why? If they attenuated, find the cause. When they worked well, what were the key factors? Can you provide those factors yourself to make the relationship work?

» Third, validate claims.

Don’t accept things on face value. Confirm with clients, former partners, accountants. It’s not unfair or impolite to ask to see the books. Call the school where the other party received the Ph.D. Don’t forget, any lies or misrepresentations will also rebound to muddy you if you’re seen as a partner.

» Fourth, maintain legal separation.

Create a sound and contractual working relationship, but don’t merge the businesses or commingle funds. Keep a “firewall” in place for protection against unknown claims or unseen flaws. This isn’t a lack of trust, it’s an act of prudence. Similarly, keep assets, web sites, support resources, computer files, and similar important aspects of your business separate and intact.

» Fifth, provide for a trial period.

Don’t over-commit. Take 30 days (or 60 or 90) to evaluate the relationship. Has it developed the way you expected? Did you both follow through on commitments? Did you learn anything surprising or new? Can you sustain this for a year or more? Have a frank discussion about the “shake down cruise.”

» Sixth, allow for unilateral rupture.

It’s best to allow either party to leave without agreement of the other party with fair notice (e.g., 60 days). This is much easier if you don’t have common assets to break apart or common debts and obligations to honor (though there may be some project delivery needs). If these relationships are tougher than marriages, the dissolutions can be far worse than divorce.

I’ve found that the best alliances are almost informal, with clear projects in mind so that they are pragmatic and not conceptual. The partners come together and depart again as circumstances dictate. Therefore, only clear and legitimate business is driving the relationship, which becomes truly symbiotic. Moreover, the lawyers aren’t involved, which will keep things less expensive and less traumatic all around.

In 18 years as a solo practitioner, I’ve had three alliances, two of which served a finite and clear purpose, and the other of which is in place for several years. The point is that these don’t come along frequently, and you shouldn’t feel badly in dismissing the vast preponderance of the offers.

Finally, never establish a close relationship with a direct competitor or someone who may enter your particular business field or niche. Never share existing client information, or invite people in to meet your buyers. That may happen far down the alliance road, but it’s never needed at the outset and can constitute an enormous price to pay if you’ve made a mistake with your prospective partner. Be cautious, prudent, and safe. You can succeed wonderfully on your own.

Article reprinted with permission from Alan Weiss.

Alan Weiss

Alan Weiss is one of those rare people who can say he is a consultant, speaker and author and mean it. His consulting firm, Summit Consulting Group, Inc. has attracted clients such as Merck, Hewlett-Packard, GE, Mercedes-Benz, State Street Corporation, Times Mirror Group, The Federal Reserve, The New York Times, and over 400 other leading organizations. He serves on the boards of directors of the Trinity Repertory Company, a Tony-Award-winning New England regional theater, and the Newport International Film Festival. His speaking typically includes 30 keynotes a year at major conferences, and he has been a visiting faculty member at Case Western Reserve University, Boston College, Tufts, St. John's, the University of Illinois, the Institute of Management Studies, and the University of Georgia Graduate School of Business. He has held an appointment as adjunct professor in the Graduate School of Business at the University of Rhode Island where he taught courses on advanced management and consulting skills. He holds the record for selling out the highest priced workshop (on entrepreneurialism) in the 21-year history of New York City's Learning Annex. His Ph.D. is in psychology and he is a member of the American Psychological Society, the American Counseling Association, Division 13 of the American Psychological Association, and the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. He was recently appointed to the Board of Governors of Harvard University's Center for Mental Illness and the Media. He has keynoted for the American Psychological Association on two occasions...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.


Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!